January 26, 2006
Brian McLaren on the Homosexual Question 2: A Blogger's Response
Tweet
Since posting Brian McLaren's commentary about homosexuality we've had difficulty keeping pace with the responses being written. Reading through the comments reveals why homosexuality is known as a "wedge issue" in our culture. Our readers appear divided between heralding McLaren as a prophet, and condemning him as a heretic. Below is one response we received by a blogger named Jeff who disagrees with McLaren's suggested five year moratorium on making pronouncements about homosexuality. But unlike many other critics, Jeff also writes about his very personal engagement with this issue.
1. To make the accusation that "we" (evangelicals or the church or the "religious right" whoever "we" are) consider homosexuality to be somehow "more sinful" than any other transgression based on the fact that we seem to be giving so much time, energy and attention to it at present is somewhat unfair. The church didn't have a secret meeting somewhere and decide that now is the time to take action against "those homosexuals." Our reaction has been totally defensive, forced upon us by court-mandated acceptance of homosexual marriage, the consecration of homosexuals to leadership positions in the church, the media's glorification of the homosexual lifestyle and the continuing actions of the militant portion of the homosexual community.
Just as abortion became a dominant issue for the church only after Roe v. Wade, so homosexuality has attained prominence in the aftermath of these significant events. Those "pronouncements" that Brian bewails are the equivalent of "raising up a standard against the enemy" who is truly "coming in like a flood."
2. I fear that Brian's desired "moratorium" is more likely to turn into a "surrender" than anything else. It will certainly be a unilateral one, for the voices crying for more and more acceptance of the homosexual lifestyle will certainly NOT be silent while we take our little siesta. We followed a similar path before in the areas of science, politics and education, somehow believing that if we ignored the problem it would surely go away, and those institutions are now almost exclusively controlled by the secular world view. Silence now in the area of morality, even in the name of reason and "seeking the will of God," would accomplish no more. Of course, if we're really not sure what to think about homosexuality, then this will help solve that problem without any undue exertion on our part ?
3. Many have suggested that the church does not speak out nearly so forcefully against such sins as gossip, gluttony and greed as we do against homosexuality, apparently suggesting that we take the same line with sexual sin as we have with these more common indiscretions. Is it not more correct to call us to speak with clarity and force against these sins as well? It is certainly not to our credit that we have allowed them to go unchallenged, and the condition of many of our churches today shows the results. The solution is MORE consistent preaching of the truth, not less.
4. We have already lost - or are badly losing - in the war against other sexual sins. When all statistics and surveys show that divorce, adultery and fornication are present among church members in the same proportions as in the world at large, that is the only conclusion that we can draw. Having begun by softening the edges of the Biblical position on divorce, the rest seems to be swirling down the drain along with it. Perhaps we have drawn this line to avoid giving the enemy a complete victory in the area of sexuality. For now, incest and pedophilia are still taboo; but once we redefine marriage and relationships to include homosexuals, can the others be far behind? That slope, indeed, is slippery .
5. Is the stand we are taking against homosexuality really so radical? In virtually all the states where defense of marriage propositions or amendments have appeared on the ballot, they have been overwhelmingly approved. Call it homophobia if you will; I dare to believe that there is still a spark of the divine image left in people that cringes at the thought of the word "family" being so radically redefined.
6. Could we finally put to rest that old saw about "hating the sin but loving the sinner?" Only God is capable of such a dichotomy; the rest of us all fail to some degree - some of us miserably! - on one end or the other. Words to the contrary notwithstanding, many of the responses I have read have either shied far from a truly divine hatred of the sin of homosexuality, or a truly divine love for the homosexual. In any case, we are not required to hate sin in order to speak out against it; all we must do is recognize it for what it is and what it does to the people who practice it. Leave the hating and vengeance and judgment and punishment to God, Who has done, does and will do them all well and properly. Let's concentrate on the love to which we are frequently and forcefully called in the Word - a love which both speaks out and is silent as led by the Spirit.
7. I wonder if the God Who said that the watcher on the wall is held responsible for those who die because of his failure to warn of the enemy's approach will accept a "moratorium" as our excuse for the thousands who will enter eternity in their sin while we consider our course?
8. One comment suggested that trying to help a homosexual find his or her way out of that lifestyle is equivalent to an "abortion of the identity." But our identity is not defined by our sexuality - no matter how much the homosexual activists would like us to think that it is - any more than our identity is truly defined by our jobs or our families or our past or our political affiliation. Our "sense" of identity may be bound to these things, but that is another thing altogether. Our true identity is exclusively defined by our relationship to Christ. Anything else that claims to be is a pretender.
9. Finally, as a person who struggled as a pastor for 17 years (though not currently) and as a homosexual for more than 40, I can only testify from my own experience that it is not more understanding from Christians that I need; it is more of Christ, and He comes with both truth and grace. But to receive that grace, I must first become aware of the truth of my situation. So is one more important than the other? In terms of preeminence, no; in terms of sequence, at least perhaps. Grace has no appeal, no meaning, to the person who feels or sees no need for it. Until I am confronted with the truth of who and what I am - not from a theological perspective, but from a Divine one - I cannot truly receive forgiveness for what makes me what I am. And ultimately, it is not homosexuality that makes me a sinner; it is sin which makes me a homosexual. It makes you something different, but it's still sin.
Personally, yes there are times that I wish I had a greater circle of initiated friends in the church to whom I could speak candidly about my daily struggles with my besetting sin. Not nearly enough Christians have come to grips with their personal loathing for this particular problem to the extent that they can be effective as friends, confidants or evangelists to most homosexuals. But as others here have put it, it is both grace AND truth that I and my fellow-travelers need. Either without the other is insufficient. I need the accountability of those who will hold my behavior up to the plumb line of truth and show me my erring; I need the support of those who bring God's grace to life by binding my wounds and caring for me when the thief comes to steal, kill and destroy.
Perhaps someday, Brian, it will be your personal "favorite" sin that will be part of the newspaper headlines. It will be interesting to see if a moratorium is appropriate then.
Posted by UrL Scaramanga on January 26, 2006
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://blog.christianitytoday.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/44
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Brian McLaren on the Homosexual Question 2: A Blogger's Response:
» Taking Things Personally from theopraxis
I'm in the habit of taking small breaks from the blogosphere. It helps me to keep perspective on the whole thing. This time was different than most, though - I had a lot to say on a particular topic, none... [Read More]
Tracked on January 29, 2006
» Around the web - Week of January 31, 2006 from ChristianThinker.net
Here's a few things of interest from the blogosphere and various corners of the web.McLaren blogosphere controversy: Emergent church leader Brian McLaren recently wrote about his position on homosexuality at Christianity Today's Leadership blog. Response [Read More]
Tracked on January 31, 2006
» Fisking McLaren on Homosexuality from JOLLYBLOGGER
For a couple of weeks now I've been wanting to weigh in on this whole Brian McLaren - Mark Driscoll hubub over homosexuality. But with being out of town, playing catch-up on other stuff after being out of town, [Read More]
Tracked on February 10, 2006

Comments
Wow.
Jeff's testimony reminds me of one of my best friends. She is a practicing lesbian.
In college, she told all of her other friends she was gay before she told us. "I thought you'd just tell me I was going to hell," she said. That hurt.
Later she asked me what I thought the Bible said about homosexuality. To be asked such a question was intensely humbling. At the time I couldn't say what I thought. I told her that I didn't feel worthy to answer the question because it is not a sin I struggle with. To call her out as a sinner somehow more entrenched than me in a "life style of sin" was too easy since I didn't struggle with the same sin.
Perhaps I was wishy-wishy. Perhaps I have conformed to the world. But it seemed like it was better to love her and maintain a relationship with her than explode our friendship with the political rhetoric of the gay debate. I still love her. She is still one of my best friends. Someday I hope to express the love of Christ in a way that touches her and her partner.
Besides I have sins I struggle with regularly. Regularly. I feel like Paul in Romans 7 and 8. Who can save me from this body of death? If people knew my heart they might say I am living a "life style of sin." But I suspect the same could be said for all of us. Thank God for Jesus.
My question for the blog goes beyond theology and apologetics. I need stories. Does anyone have stories of how they answered this question in grace and truth?
Posted by: Mark Goodyear at January 26, 2006
WOW! Well said. I am acquainted with several people who have declared their homosexuality. I truely love some of them because they are great people. I don't even like others of them because they are just not folks I respect, for reasons not even remotely connected to homosexuality. With the ones with whom I have a good relationship, there has been honest dialogue about the fact that homosexuality is sin and so is adultry and gossip and envy, JUDGEMENTALISM, and strife and I don't ostracize the people I know based on sin. If I did I'd have no friends and they sure wouldn't want to have anything to do with me.
The key seems to be "truth and love." And you're right, it is a Divine balance and only through the active work of the Holy Spirit in our lives can we extend both (truth and love) in equal parts.
God bless you in your daily struggles to live a Godly life. May you experience the full balance of truth, love and grace that is the true representation of our Abba.
Posted by: Liz at January 26, 2006
In response to this article everyone needs to understand Homosexually is a sin. (I sent a post yesterday, but oddly enough it never made it to the blog). I feel very strongly about this so I will try and post again. Old testament and New are very clear on this issue.
Leviticus 18:22
Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable.
1 Corinthians 6:9-10
9Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders 10nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
Let us understand we are to be like Jesus. He first loved his disciples, and then blessed them with knowledge. We are to show homosexual people we love them. Let it be known we are to love the person (John 13:34-35 A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. 35By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another) and hate the sin (Roman 12:9 Love must be sincere. Hate what is evil; cling to what is good).
We all fall short of the glory of God. Only through Christ Jesus can we be saved. To understand God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit we must love. (See 1 Corinthians 13).
Once we have shown love, then the Holy Spirit can reveal God’s truth to them. We are the Lord’s servants and must act accordingly. Let us remember we are to seek the will of the Father not our own. May God’s truth and love shine upon each and every one of us. May the Holy Spirit speak through us and guide us as we serve the Lord. Amen.
Posted by: David Holste at January 26, 2006
I agree with Brian. The Lord dealt with me some time ago about our attitude toward homosexuals and that we were cutting them off and alienating them. I remember a story I heard about Madlyn Murray O'Hara. She said she had received a letter that was kind and said they were praying for her. In all the years that is the FIRST one she received like that and it did speak to her. We need to stop screaming and boycotting and do some loving and serving with God's heart.
Posted by: Laura Bowman at January 26, 2006
I worked for and with lesbians for a few years in the horticulture business. They knew I was a Christian, and after years of building a relationship with them they began to ask what I thought of their lifestyle, as well as what the Bible teaches about homosexuality. I was honest with them. I did not coddle them, or dance around the issue. I presented them with the clear teachings of Scripture (and they are clear).
They did not get angry with me, or stop talking to me. Instead they respected my beliefs and me for having the courage to talk to them about this very personal issue.
You know why they responded the way they did? Because I loved them as human beings who were created in the image of God just like me. I loved them because I knew that apart from Christ I was no different than they were because sin is sin, there are no levels of sin in the eyes of God. All sin separates us from God.
You know how they knew I loved them? Because I was a servant towards them. I went out of my way to show the love of Christ to them by the way I lived around them. They did not see a hypocrite who said one thing but did another. I tried to be consistent around them and show them what true Christianity looks like, because the stories they told me about other Christian encounters they had made me realize that far too often Christians do not look very much like the One whose name they wear.
One of those women recognized the nature of her lifestyle, confessed to her family and to God that it was sinful, repented of that lifestyle, and is seeking to change her ways to be more in line with how God expects His people to live.
Is that enough of a story to show why it is important for Christians to be up front and honest about this issue, but also to be representatives of Christ towards the lost which means consistently living what Scripture teaches? Telling someone else that they need to repent of their sins means nothing if those telling them have not done the same thing themselves.
Posted by: James at January 26, 2006
Beautiful.
Posted by: Alvin at January 26, 2006
Double wow!
That is the most articulate argument yet. Jeff is to be commended for understanding the mind of Christ on a level that most of us have yet to attain on this issue.
I was humbled by his response. I will strive to show the love of Christ as I lift up the banner of the gospel. Confrontation without condemnation is a very difficult thing to do. With God's help I'd like to get better at it.
Thank you Jeff. May God give me the wisdom to deal with my own sin(s) in a way that will bring honor and fame to his name.
Posted by: pjlr at January 26, 2006
Great word, brother. A great word. Thanks for your testimony.
Posted by: Denny Burk at January 26, 2006
I think it is important to point out the weakness of the worldview underlying McLaren's suggestion of a "non-position" in regard to homosexuality. Since one of the highest virtues of the postmodern worldview is to be a defender of the oppressed, McLaren is running into a problem with his position on homosexuality because to call it sin would look like oppressing a people group. Furthermore, this is the same problem we see in other writings from McLaren where is takes a non-position on a potentially oppresive issue (i.e. universalism).
I feel for McLaren because he is in a struggle that any of us face when challenged with filtering our worldview through Scripture. I would recommend he read William Webb's compassionate but honest, "Slaves, Women, and Homosexuals" which has already done what he is suggesting through a moratorium.
Posted by: Rob at January 27, 2006
Jeff,
Thanks a lot for your clear possition. I believe that the Church (emergent or not) needs to have a clear position on the issue of homosexuality. It is important to highlight that being relevant for this generation does not mean compromising the faith, and the principles of the Kingdom.
As Christian man, in ministry, and ex-practicing homosexual, I have to admit that in the midst of the current debate we need structure and reference, we need the truth.
Bieng part of the leadership does not make me perfect, hence I need the truth spoken by the Church, reminding me that even what my eyes see (e.g. happy homosexual couples), I should not conform to the spirit of the age, but find and refind my identity in a relationship with Jesus. I need more of Jesus, and someone that clearly set the boundaries.
It is indeed unfortunate that Pr. McLaren did not make a clearer statement. However, I may understand his pastoral heart trying to avoid hurting others.
Thanks again for being relevant, and not compromising the principles of the Kingdom!
Times of Refreshing
Posted by: Times Of Refreshing at January 27, 2006
I don't normally do BLOGs and I think the first commentator responded well in defending the evangelical position on homosexualtiy.
I live and work in England where there are possibly 60+ Ministers of Parliment that are either openly gay or need to be "outed" (according to Peter Tachel). It is also the case that to declare publicly that you are anti-gay is to incur the possible wrath of local authorities and that may include a police investigation and potential charges of committing a "hate crime."
Consequently, I live in a culture that treats the homosexual as an ethnic minority. I don't agree with that position and continue to maintain the view that Scripture clearly defines homosexuality as an abhorrent practise to God.
Now for the article. Without trying to change the writer's mind, I would offer some observations on his ministry and pastoral style. A few examples from his text:
1. "Frankly, many of us don't know what we should think about homosexuality." I would politely suggest that ths poor writer has either been living in a very secluded world or has somehow failed to keep up in his research. For a pastor to not have taken a positon of anykind and to confess that he is in the dark about an issue that is ripping cultures, families and politics to bits is tantamount to being in breach of contract. The very concept of being a Christian leader is to lead; an issue this serious is not one that can be relegated to the "No opinion" categorgy.
2. "Even if we are convinced that all homosexual behavior is always sinful, we still want to treat gay and lesbian people with more dignity, gentleness, and respect than our colleagues do."
No argument there; we always care for a person, even as we seek to pull them out of the water.
3. "We aren't sure if or where lines are to be drawn, nor do we know how to enforce with fairness whatever lines are drawn." Ummm... does Sodom and Gomorrah give us a picture of God's lines drawn? Not that I am suggesting torching someone of course! The fact is that the OT law and history is pretty clear that God was not prepared to just "live and let live." Very little ambiguity in the Mosaic Law. And yes, I know that we are not under that but the fact remains that when God wanted to start introducing His moral nature, He came on pretty strong.
4. "Perhaps we need a five-year moratorium on making pronouncements ... When decisions need to be made, they'll be admittedly provisional ... Then in five years, if we have clarity, we'll speak; if not, we'll set another five years for ongoing reflection." OK, so you're saying it could be 10 years before you've made up your mind?!? That's 10 years of not knowing what to say to people, how to counsel on the rightness and wrongness of a set of behaviours, etc. If I told my people, "Look, I'm not sure what I believe so come back in 10 years", they'd go find another church. If it is going to take that long to make up your mind, maybe its time to admit that its already made up but no one wants to admit their postion.
Honestly, I feel sorry for the writer as he is obviously struggling but isn't certain who's voice to listen to; maybe genetics, maybe theology, etc. I would find it difficult to practise my ministry with that level of uncertainty.
Posted by: Stan at January 28, 2006