Christianity TodayPastoral LeadershipChurch ManagementMagazinesFreeChristianity Today International

If you like our blog,
check out the journal!

Subscribe to Leadership Journal

Save 21%


twitter updates




    Seminary &
    Grad School Guide
    Search by Name


    Or use Advanced Search to search by major, region, cost, affiliation, enrollment, more!



    blogs we're watching



    books we're reading


    « Angry Preachers or Gospel Musicians? | Main | Ur Video: NT Wright on Blogging »

    November 23, 2009

    One in Christ or Coffee?

    The danger of replacing Communion with a coffee bar.

    It's very difficult for many contemporary Christians to recognize how much we have been shaped by the consumer culture in which we live—it is in the air we breathe and the water (or coffee) we drink.

    Consider that in many churches the coffee bar has displaced the Lord's Table as the place where real community happens. Due in part to the neutralizing of sacred space that has been popular since the 1980s, churches began removing or deemphasizing the Lord's Table and introducing coffee bars. Without doubt the desire has been to build community by offering people a culturally familiar setting to engage one another. But we must ask: What formative message does a coffee bar convey?

    A coffee bar mostly carries the values of our culture. We've come to expect coffee bars to offer a number of choices to meet our desires (decaf, tea, hot chocolate), and the setting is one of leisure and comfort. We usually gather in affinity groups. We sip the beverages not because we're thirsty but because we're conditioned to want them.

    By contrast, what does the Lord's Table convey? It is a symbol of sacrificial love that breaks down cultural divisions and barriers of affinity. It reminds us that life is about being chosen by the Lord for interpersonal communion rather than choosing to consume stuff, and it reminds us we are called to take up our cross rather than seek personal comfort.

    Both the coffee bar and Lord's Table affirm community, but the kind of community they affirm differs significantly. Churches with coffee bars may have to work harder to ensure they are fostering community around the values of Christ rather than casual consumerism.

    At the same time, there is no guarantee that a church that prominently displays the Lord's Table and forgoes coffee will automatically model unity, pastoral care, or break down cultural and generational cliques. It's particularly hard when we engage the Lord's Table privately or solely with our friends and loved ones.

    A congregation I served restructured its space to celebrate Communion with greater intentionality. One Sunday after the sermon, the congregation proceeded to the fellowship hall to celebrate the Lord's Supper around large, circular tables. We were encouraged to intentionally sit with people with whom we didn't normally associate and to share with those at our table what the Lord's sacrifice meant to us personally. After each person shared, everyone was to break bread from the loaf provided and dip it into the Communion cup at the table. This process was to continue until everyone had shared.

    One woman came to me several weeks later and said that this had been the most meaningful celebration of Communion she had ever experienced. She was grateful the church had restructured its space to move us beyond our comfort zones of associating simply with the people we already knew.

    In this example space, and how we utilized it, became a medium for communicating the values of the gospel and deconstructing the values of our consumer culture.

    Read the full article at LeadershipJournal.net

    Paul Louis Metzger is professor of Christian theology & theology of culture at Multnomah Biblical Seminary in Portland, Oregon.

    Posted by UrL Scaramanga on November 23, 2009



    Trackback Pings

    TrackBack URL for this entry:
    http://blog.christianitytoday.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3612



    Comments

    The way you conducted communion is fantastic and I think I may do that someday as a preacher (I'm not a preacher yet). However, the simple fact is that there is no community in the majority of church communions now (maybe there never really was after the NT Church). Taking a wafer (really? A processed wafer?) and a small drink of grape juice does not constitute or foster community.

    And so we serve coffee in the fellowship hall. I'm not saying we failed with the "old" style of communion, but it's definitely not about a group of believers accepting that we as a community have taken up our cross. At least this will be the case until more churches take your example.

    Posted by: Dan Smith at November 23, 2009

    I absolutely love that model of communion that you shared there. Some of the most meaningful times in my journey with Christ have been during very relational and intentional times of communion, similar to what you shared. Awesome.

    Posted by: jstainer at November 23, 2009

    Can someone fill me in on what exactly "The Lord's Table" is? I started going to church in the 90's and I am not familiar with the meaning. It sounds like communion is involved but maybe not in the way that I am used to. Thanks.

    Posted by: J. Ben at November 23, 2009

    Our congregation is out of the restoration movement (heavy emphasis on communion and baptism). But in our efforts to be seeker friendly, we have sort of isolated weekly communion to a back room (a prayerful and silent space that's perfect for an individual who happens to want communion that particular Sunday). Meanwhile, we have a 1,000 square feet of lobby space that functions as a coffee bar. A coffee bar I love and frequent!!

    I don't think coffee and communion are inherently at odds, but as Paul rightly observes, the rise of one happens to be correlating with the decline of the other.

    IMHO, the house and simple churches who practice a full meal Lord's Supper probably are best positioned to convey the type of community our Lord desires and the type of community our current culture desires. Yet, many of us are too limited by our pragmatism to practice communion in a community-oriented way.

    Posted by: Chad Hall at November 23, 2009

    I like the fresh idea of participating in the Lord's Supper gathered around "round" tables. Not sure I've heard of churches giving up the Lord's Table for Coffee Bars/Tables. Are you suggesting they have quit taking the Lord Supper all together and now sit around and drink coffee? If so, I wonder where the thought of "as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord's death till He comes." (1 Cor 11:26) ... comes in? We cannot abandon culture for biblical practice of Christ's ordinances. Love coffee, but also love the community around the Lord's Supper.

    Posted by: Bob at November 23, 2009

    Ooops ... said it backwards ... we cannot abandon biblical principled practices such as the Lord's Supper for culture. Culture changes all the time ... the Lord, His Word does not.

    Posted by: Bob at November 23, 2009

    Most churches have no community at all. I think a coffee bar is a step in the right direction. There is no community around communion as you suggest. I love your example of people sitting around tables and sharing about their lives, that is much less communion and much more people simply sharing. This should be happening in the Church, but it's not!

    I'm w/ Chad Hall. I participate in house church, and for me it's much more like the example of communion you heralded, Paul, then what our churches do today in any arena (except for home groups). To me, that is where true community is found, around talking and sharing - something we don't do in the modern church.

    Paul, I think it's a mistake to criticize the coffee thing, or think this kind of community must happen around communion. Why do you suggest it must happen around communion & not coffee? What are the practical implications?

    Posted by: Jesse Phillips at November 23, 2009

    Jesse, the community I think Paul talks about here is more of the transcendent type - communion of saints, a sacred communion that doesn't quite make tangible sense. His definition of coffee=consumer; communion=sacrifice is spot on. Relationships shouldn't be consumerist in nature to begin with. They should be interdependent between people, and with God.

    Posted by: Anne Jackson at November 23, 2009

    Holy Communion or Eurcharist is not just about community. It is about the symbolism, if your not orthodox, or the literal representation of Christ's body and blood. We participate in this sacrement or ordinance to Remember Christ (Do this in rememberance of me).
    Why evangelical churches have nearly quit the practice of communion (as well as chucked out anything else that seems traditional) is beyond my comprehension. You can go months without it. We may not all agree together from a denominational stance, but regardless if we go back to the earliest records of Christian Worship and the Lord's Day (Sunday) Holy communion is present as the centerpiece of the service. I say we bring it back. Some of you may read this and challenge my ideals as old fashioned, but I, in return, challenge you to pray about it and try incorporating it in your life. Save the Starbucks for Starbucks.

    Posted by: Nate Rowlan at November 23, 2009

    I like this post. I like the clarity regarding the difference between the coffee bar (consumer) and the communion (table). I don't think this has to be an either/or (either a coffee bar or a communion table). Yet, at the same time, I think what he is stressing here is very important. It is telling when we get more excited about something that connects with our consumerism than with a practice that flows out of the sacrifice of Christ.

    Posted by: Jim Martin at November 23, 2009

    I like this post. Specifically, I like the clarification between what is consumerist and what is sacrificial (the Lords's Supper). It is telling when we seem more consumed with what appeals to our consumerist urges than what might appeal to the transcendent, the sacrificial.

    Posted by: Jim Martin at November 23, 2009

    The fact is, we have no indication from the NT that Jesus ever intended to start another "temple-based" religion. Yet this is what we have! He envisioned his Jewish followers to experience Him and then to extend that experience to their real worlds (salt and light). Our contemporary "communion" services do as Paul says, "more harm than good" (1 Cor. 11:17). Jesus wants coffee and communion--he modeled a consistent ability to be in the world yet not of it--but we must be engaging culture and our gatherings should reflect that (i.e., coffee and tea). I think the real problem is that church has become the end instead of the means--we "sabbath" together so that we can have our hearts recalibrated so we can venture out again as light in a dark world.

    Posted by: Steve Smallwood at November 24, 2009

    What about having the coffee time with the emblems on each table and as you come together with others, in the lobby or wherever you serve coffee, out of relationship with each other as Christs body we share in the emblems thus remembering what was broken and shed for us. Because that is what has brought us together in the first place as believers. Out of that relationship we want to share the word and the coffee.

    Posted by: George at November 24, 2009

    My pastor understands completely that we need to serve coffee in the lobby. It gives us a reason to stand around and commune with one another and also be there when someone new comes into the building.. It's just basic hospitality.

    However, he doesn't understand communion other than it's "a memorial service that's hard to make meaningful".

    So, I agree with that the coffee bar could possibly be a substitute for communion, but I think we should do both--the coffee as an act of hospitality and communion as a nourishing act for believers.

    Posted by: Me2 at November 24, 2009

    Like Chad, I too have a long history with the Restoration Movement. I grew up in it, attended one of their colleges and worshiped in their churches for 50 years. Traditionally, they observe the Lord's Supper every Lord's Day. Some do it better than others. For the past 20 years I have been a part of the Baptist General Conference. Communion at our church is usually on the first Sunday of the month. But the leadership does not have any real compunctions about moving it to the evening (we have no regular evening service), moving it to the second Sunday when other programming gets in the way or eliminating for the month altogether. Over my lifetime in the Evangelical Church I have notice a gradual deemphasis on communion (we observe it as long as it doesn't interfere with whatever else we are doing. Baptism (immersion) has already suffered this fate within Evangelicalism, with few exceptions. These two ordinances or sacrements were instituted to help us understand and remember the atoning death and resurrection of Christ. In our rush to be all things to all people and to program to death, we are destroying two important elements of the Christian life and corporate worship.

    Posted by: Paul Willingham at November 24, 2009

    A modern-day writing on the wall?

    "You praised the gods of silver and gold, of bronze, iron, wood and stone, which cannot see or hear or understand. But you did not honor the God who holds in his hand your life and all your ways." (Daniel 5:23)

    "Beware of anything that competes with your loyalty to Jesus Christ. The greatest competitor of true devotion to Jesus is the service we do for Him. It is easier to serve than to pour out our lives completely for Him. The goal of the call of God is His satisfaction, not simply that we should do something for Him. We are not sent to do battle for God, but to be used by God in His battles. Are we more devoted to service than we are to Jesus Christ Himself?" - Oswald Chambers, "My Utmost for His Highest"

    Posted by: still at November 25, 2009

    I may be missing the point but I don't see the conflict. In every church I have ever been in, communion was and is a ritual in which everyone silently eats a piece of bread and drinks a tiny cup of wine or juice. This does signify unity and fellowship but not as it is commonly understood as talking with each other, etc. As another commenter said, that is why we have a coffee hour. Even the circular table idea doesn't seem to give the same kind of fellowship. But each church should do what they think is best.

    Posted by: michael at November 27, 2009

    Yes,you are on the right track....we must outlaw coffee and music and kites....women must stay at home...and men must grow beards or be flogged....The Taliban considers most forms of music to be "shirk" or associating anything with GOD ...and judging from the illustration of folks worshiping a huge pot of coffee, you must feel that way about the hot beverage....come on man, lighten up it's only COFFEE!

    Posted by: Steve H. at November 30, 2009

    @Steve H.: I think you've missed it. Metzger is not advocating getting rid of coffee as much as he is putting forth the idea that what we emphasize is telling of where our values lie. In this case, that the current trend is a prominence of the coffee bar over and against the Lord's Table is a good illustration of how we are emphasizing a consumer mindset and not the emphasis of the Lord's Supper of consumption.

    The coffee bar and communion create very different sorts of community, the coffee bar tends to be a place where those of us with similar likes gather together over our similarities, whereas the community represented in communion is one that gathers us in spite of our differences, even though outside of communion in Christ we may have no reason to associate with each other.

    Posted by: theycallmepastorbryan at November 30, 2009

    Post a comment






    Remember Me?

    (1500 characters max; you may use HTML tags for style)

    Verification (needed to reduce spam):