« The Phil Vischer Podcast: Ep 30- Atheist Tracks, Sexy Christian Shirts, & Naughty vs. Nice | Main | 3 Signs You Are Not a Kingdom Leader »
January 2, 2013
No, We're Not a Hate Group
Another explanation for the "Crazy Uncle" Christians in the media.
Following the terrible elementary shooting last month in Connecticut, Michael Cheshire wrote a blog post that attracted a lot of attention. He was incensed by the comments of a number of Christian leaders in the media. He wrote:
After watching an interview by a person speaking for our Christian religion, I was less than blessed. He subtly blamed the gays, iPods, computers, evolution, and the fact that God is not in our schools for the shooting in Connecticut. I was compelled to distance myself from him as quickly as possible. It’s a feeling I have had many times over the years when our so-called “religious leaders” make accusatory remarks about entire people groups.
Cheshire was not alone in his outrage and embarrassment. I often feel the same way about those who speak for our faith in the media. It seems that after any calamity, whether human or natural, there are Christian leaders on cable news offering an overly-simplistic, overly-spiritual, and overly-self-righteous explanation for the carnage. Cheshire compared these leaders with a “crazy uncle who makes ignorant comments.” They are often wrong and offensive, but they’re family.
Michael Cheshire’s critique expanded beyond the horror at Sandy Hook Elementary, however. He lamented that American Christianity has become “tainted with a lot of hate and politics.” In fact he titled his post, “They Think We’re a Hate Group, & They Might Be Right.” (This title was written by Cheshire himself and not the editors of Out of Ur.) Again, I resonate a great deal with what he wrote, particularly the general sentiment of frustration over the culture’s perception of Christian faith and the Church. So I do not wish for what follows to be interpreted as a counterpoint to Cheshire’s post, but rather as another angle from which to perceive what’s happening in the American Church.
As I’ve traveled around the country and interacted with many Christians leaders and organizations, I’ve been immensely blessed by what I’ve found. The church in America is not a hate group. Most Christians, including conservative evangelicals, do not wish to see their gay and lesbian neighbors discriminated against. Most do not wish harm to those of other faiths. Most do not believe one political party has a corner on righteousness, and most do not believe we should pursue a theocracy. Through my involvement with projects like This Is Our City, I’ve seen many Christians serving, working, and sacrificing to bless and transform their communities into oases of justice, beauty, and abundance. Among younger Christians leaders I see even more hope for the cultivation of this common good approach to social engagement and an end to the culture wars and politicalization of the church that began in the 1970s.
What I felt Cheshire missed in his post was the narrative-shaping influence of the media both upon those outside and inside the church. Yes, there are many “crazy uncles” featured on cable news programs that misrepresent Jesus and embarrass the church. And, yes, there are hateful communities that claim the title of “Christian” and slander the name of Christ as a result. But we must ask ourselves, why are these men and women chosen to speak for Christians by the popular media? Where are the hundreds of godly, wise, humble, and compassionate leaders that shepherd evangelical churches, colleges, and organizations? Why are they not seen on cable news? And if Common Good Christians are featured, why are they so underrepresented?
There is another explanation for why uncharitable Christian voices dominate the secular media.
In the free market of the media it is not fair and accurate reporting that gets rewarded, but page views, clicks, and Neilson ratings. With online and cable news outlets struggling for viewers (and revenue), there is constant pressure for these organization to not just report news but make it. Therefore, when a Christian leader is needed to comment on an event, they are more likely to invite a Crazy Uncle Christian known for shooting his mouth off and insulting minorities than the thoughtful, reflective Christian offering wisdom.
Sometimes this cheap journalism is done by Progressives with an agenda to discredit Christian faith and institutions (as Timothy Dalrymple explains in this post well worth your time to read), but more often it’s simply a matter of pragmatics. If you’re behind the editorial desk at CNN and desperate for page views, which story are you going to publish:
“Christian Leader Fasts and Prays for Victims of School Shooting”
or
“Christian Leader Blames Shooting on School Prayer Ban”
Sadly, when sensationalism sells it’s going to be the crazy uncles in Christendom that get media attention. Over time this creates the popular perception that all Christians share the views of those spotlighted by the media, especially among those who have no un-mediated interaction with Christians themselves. But there is an even more dangerous side-effect of the media’s elevation of Crazy Uncle Christians. With access to the prestige and platform that comes with media attention, Crazy Uncles actually start to influence the views of more Christians. In other words, the tail starts wagging the dog. Christians too start believing the church is a hate-mongering, homophobic, and theocratic special interest group. This is the trap evident in Michael Cheshire’s post. He’s accepted the media’s narrative of American Christianity as reality.
Don’t get me wrong, there is no question that the Church in the United States has real problems as well as a severe PR issue. It is the child born from the union of partisan evangelical leaders and media sensationalism over 30 years ago, but we cannot allow the church’s media-created image to become its on-the-ground reality. We must seek to know, first hand, the deeper reality of American Christianity that exists offline and off air because it is a Christianity lived more charitably, humbly, and lovingly than popularly believed or presented by the media.
Comments
Though Governor/Pastor Huckabee was skewered by secular and Christian bloggers alike, I appreciated his comments just following the tragedy – and not because I see all tragedies as a judgement of God, or a consequence of our wimpy American faith. But the Governor's original comments (which I post on my blog) were made in response to Neil Cavuto's (Fox News) TV show on the day of the gut-wrenching event. Cavuto specifically said to Huckabee, "I'm going to try to have the preacher in you, the man of God in you... [to] help us with this." He followed up with his second, more pointed question: "You know, invariably people ask, after tragedies like this, 'How could God let this happen?'"
Every pastor (and many Christians) were getting the same kind of question. In his defense, Pastor Huckabee (and it was the Pastor which responded) was not prepared for the question, which is the most difficult question in Christian theology and apologetics. One can fill a library with books on the one question, and it is impossible to give any kind of worthwhile answer in a sound bite or two, and even the most well-prepared answer will fail to make anyone feel better because it is our hearts that are in pain, not our heads.
Mike Huckabee heard the same thing I heard from Neil Cavuto: "Do we place the blame for this horror at God's feet?" to which Huckabee (correctly) said no. Because his answer was unjustifiably oversimplified into "If we had school prayer, these messes would never happen," people did not hear the helpful and heartfelt pastoral words he offered: "there is no human rationale or explanation.... This is a heart issue.... [W]e've made [school] a place where we do not want to talk about eternity, life, what responsibility means, accountability.... But God will be there in the form of a lot people with hugs and with therapy and a whole lot of ways in which I think he will be involved in the aftermath."
A day after the shooting, after he had time to process the events himself, Huckabee said on his own show, "Well maybe it's simply the attempt to express our collective shock when we say, 'We're trying to make sense of the horrific shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School.' But we're not gonna make sense, not from that which is totally disconnected from the cognitive capacity of any rational human being. The Governor of Connecticut, Dan Malloy, got it right when he said, 'Evil has visited this community.'"
He's right. There is evil, but the presence of evil does not prove the absence of God. After such public and sickening evil, there are so many public needs, but most can be placed into two big columns: emotional and rational. Give an answer that may comfort someone's emotions and someone will (rightly) say, "But that doesn't explain anything." Give an answer that addresses someone's rational need for explanation and someone will (rightly) say, "But that doesn't address our hurts!"
Actually, I think Pastor Huckabee's much maligned response was not so much the wise counsel of a pastor as they were the words of an average Christian, struggling to understand it all, and angry at the miserable situation and our inability to do anything to guarantee that it will never happen again.
Posted By: Don White | January 1, 2013 8:02 PM
I agree! We are NOT a hate group. We as believers are supposed to be all about love. Yet, we don't hear that much about what the "love groups" have done in the media. We only hear about the hate groups. This is satan at his worst. He's doing his best to destroy God's love in the minds of the world.
However, not only does he lose in the end... but as we stand more and more as the Body of Christ and live and show God's love to the world, (which we have a responsibility to do), we're going to hear more of what God is doing in the media. I truly believe that.
Too many people are quick to blame God for all the bad stuff that happens. It's built in us to want someone to blame. However, many simply don't know who REALLY IS behind all of it. If we don't teach them, how will they know? We have a responsibility to stand up stronger and represent God here on this earth! It may not be "politically correct", but it will be Biblicially correct! He is the one we answer to!
Posted By: Deb | January 2, 2013 12:46 PM
I appreciate your piece and think that there is a lot of truth here. I also loved Michael's piece and think that you all are saying similar things. I know that Michael's article started a conversation among my network of pastors in our city and made us really think about how we were being perceived by the lost in our city.
I think that we all need to be more active about speaking our beliefs in the media as you and Michael have done. Thank you for keeping the conversation alive as the other article was a great conversation starter with many unbelievers I'm friends with.
As you have pointed out, many Christians are not hateful. My group of friends are not the hateful group that the media depicts, however perception is reality to a lost world who don't hear anything else, and without more people like you two speaking up our message will be drowned out. Keep standing up to our crazy uncles and speaking for the true Gospel.
-Charlie
Posted By: Charlie | January 2, 2013 2:20 PM
I'll note here that people like Fred are instrumental in informing me that there are people in the evangelical community who AREN'T part of that intolerance.
Posted By: mordicai | January 2, 2013 2:56 PM
Two different perspectives that give us much to think about. Thanks, Michael and Skye.
I agree with Don that the question--Why does God allows these tragedies to happen?--is the most difficult one to answer as a Christian, and that any answer one gives is bound to be problematic and, ultimately, unsatisfactory. So I'm willing to cut Pastor Huckabee some slack.
I guess I'm wondering why we don't challenge the premise that the question necessarily deserves an answer.
"Give an answer that may comfort someone's emotions and someone will (rightly) say, 'But that doesn't explain anything.' Give an answer that addresses someone's rational need for explanation and someone will (rightly) say, 'But that doesn't address our hurts!'"
So, why give an answer at all?
Hindsight is 20/20, of course. But I think I would have liked to have seen Huckabee or someone else in that position, having been asked that question on TV, simply struggle for a few minutes trying to find the right words, and then confess: "I just don't know."
I think it is significant that in the book of Job, which deals most directly with this question, Job never receives an answer for why he suffered as he did. He never finds out the reason. God gives him now answer. What he does give Job is an overwhelming, unmistakeable sense of his presence.
What if the Christian response to this tragedy that was seen by most of the world was not a man struggling for the right answer under the bright lights of national television, but rather, the silent yet unmistakeable presence of the Christian community right there in Connecticut, grieving with them as they bury their dead?
Posted By: Anonymous | January 2, 2013 3:28 PM
Deb,
"We are NOT a hate group. We as believers are supposed to be all about love."
Then why do you lie about ObamaCare providing funding for abortions?
It seems to me you're more about lying to force your religious beliefs onto others.
Posted By: jharp | January 2, 2013 4:01 PM
Skye,
"Satan doesn't care which extreme you take, as long as you take one."
And in truth, that is what is happening here in the American Church...either extreme Right, or extreme Left...it's kind of sad actually that we have come to this, and yet...it was easily foreseeable.
As much as I would like to agree with Mr. Cheshire, I found much of what he wrote to be fraught with nebulousness, and appeal to common authority without specificity. And really, he is only doing what others have done in the Church before, appeal to common authority with tangential reference to biblical teachings that are not really tied down or defined but left purposefully vague so that others may draw their own conclusions.
Leave any nebulous statement of faith hanging in the winds of human frailty long enough and the thing will drift with the wind to each point of the compass.
Which is why we need to be more specific in our discussions.
"Where does it say that in the bible?" Should be one of our most common, and dare I say over-used responses to nebulous statements about faith, and our responses to faith.
Posted By: sheerahkahn | January 3, 2013 1:03 PM
Skye-
I appreciate the insight and reflection. You are correct in that the media sets the message. It's a very interesting fact that they chose who is there to answer the questions they ask.
Don-
I appreciated your comment as well. Are we guilty of "sound-biting" our leaders? I can't tell you how many times I've been invited into the fray of a heated debate on an issue, but when I spent a few minutes actually watching what was said in it's full context I realized it was much ado about nothing. Sad that as followers of Jesus we often don't even take the time to seek the truth. Far too often it seems we are just looking for another chance to share our own opinions.
Sheer-
Love the end of your quote about "Where does it say that in the bible?" As always it's a blessing to engage, think, and be changed.
May God help us overcome *our* sin...and even ourselves!
(1 John 5:3-4)
Posted By: bil_ | January 3, 2013 4:20 PM
Umm...jharp? Where did Deb mention anything about ObamaCare and/or abortions? Don't you think maybe you've proven Skye's point?
Posted By: Rob Dunbar | January 3, 2013 9:38 PM
Any comprehensive formulation of worldview must take into account Biblical authority as well as opinion, media, etc. But let's stop simply exhorting Biblical analysis... let's do it.
I wonder if John the Baptist, Paul, Peter, and even Jesus would be "crazy uncles' by Micheal's definition.
Posted By: joe | January 7, 2013 10:10 AM
Oh this is a complicated mess... twisted journalism, over-simplification, lack of discernment on word and statement choices, and of course those terrible mis-representations of God in the public eye.
Can we just say out loud that it is likely that some of those "crazy uncles" are not even a part of the family? Their fruit bears them out.
Can we just say that folks are just too ready to be in front of the camera when they are not prepared to be in front of the camera?
Can we just say, "Let's live out the reality of faith in Christ." and stop wasting time trying to get face time in front of cameras?
Smile, show the love and compassion of Christ to all humanity in every form of kindness possible. This will drive them crazy and you will enjoy life a lot more. Over-simplification maybe, but true nonetheless...
Posted By: Mark Gomez | January 8, 2013 11:44 AM
Post a comment: